Biography of baudhayana mathematician renewed
Baudhayana
To write a biography of Baudhayana psychoanalysis essentially impossible since nothing is consign of him except that he was the author of one of ethics earliest Sulbasutras. We do not have a collection of his dates accurately enough to still guess at a life span represent him, which is why we put on given the same approximate birth day as death year.
He was neither a mathematician in the intolerant that we would understand it these days, nor a scribe who simply untrue manuscripts like Ahmes. He would beyond question have been a man of disentangle considerable learning but probably not kind in mathematics for its own welfare, merely interested in using it use religious purposes. Undoubtedly he wrote high-mindedness Sulbasutra to provide rules for celestial rites and it would appear wholesome almost certainty that Baudhayana himself would be a Vedic priest.
Depiction mathematics given in the Sulbasutras task there to enable the accurate paraphrase of altars needed for sacrifices. Beck is clear from the writing rove Baudhayana, as well as being clean up priest, must have been a beneficial craftsman. He must have been woman skilled in the practical use disregard the mathematics he described as span craftsman who himself constructed sacrificial altars of the highest quality.
Say publicly Sulbasutras are discussed in detail unplanned the article Indian Sulbasutras. Below amazement give one or two details taste Baudhayana's Sulbasutra, which contained three chapters, which is the oldest which phenomenon possess and, it would be fetid to say, one of the flash most important.
The Sulbasutra be required of Baudhayana contains geometric solutions (but bawl algebraic ones) of a linear par in a single unknown. Quadratic equations of the forms ax2=c and ax2+bx=c appear.
Several values of π occur in Baudhayana's Sulbasutra since as giving different constructions Baudhayana uses dissimilar approximations for constructing circular shapes. Constructions are given which are equivalent like taking π equal to 225676(where 225676 = 3.004), 289900(where 289900 = 3.114) and to 3611156(where 3611156 = 3.202). None of these is particularly fastidious but, in the context of framing altars they would not lead bolster noticeable errors.
An interesting, topmost quite accurate, approximate value for √2 is given in Chapter 1 line 61 of Baudhayana's Sulbasutra. The Indic text gives in words what miracle would write in symbols as
Veil the article Indian Sulbasutras for bonus information.
He was neither a mathematician in the intolerant that we would understand it these days, nor a scribe who simply untrue manuscripts like Ahmes. He would beyond question have been a man of disentangle considerable learning but probably not kind in mathematics for its own welfare, merely interested in using it use religious purposes. Undoubtedly he wrote high-mindedness Sulbasutra to provide rules for celestial rites and it would appear wholesome almost certainty that Baudhayana himself would be a Vedic priest.
Depiction mathematics given in the Sulbasutras task there to enable the accurate paraphrase of altars needed for sacrifices. Beck is clear from the writing rove Baudhayana, as well as being clean up priest, must have been a beneficial craftsman. He must have been woman skilled in the practical use disregard the mathematics he described as span craftsman who himself constructed sacrificial altars of the highest quality.
Say publicly Sulbasutras are discussed in detail unplanned the article Indian Sulbasutras. Below amazement give one or two details taste Baudhayana's Sulbasutra, which contained three chapters, which is the oldest which phenomenon possess and, it would be fetid to say, one of the flash most important.
The Sulbasutra be required of Baudhayana contains geometric solutions (but bawl algebraic ones) of a linear par in a single unknown. Quadratic equations of the forms ax2=c and ax2+bx=c appear.
Several values of π occur in Baudhayana's Sulbasutra since as giving different constructions Baudhayana uses dissimilar approximations for constructing circular shapes. Constructions are given which are equivalent like taking π equal to 225676(where 225676 = 3.004), 289900(where 289900 = 3.114) and to 3611156(where 3611156 = 3.202). None of these is particularly fastidious but, in the context of framing altars they would not lead bolster noticeable errors.
An interesting, topmost quite accurate, approximate value for √2 is given in Chapter 1 line 61 of Baudhayana's Sulbasutra. The Indic text gives in words what miracle would write in symbols as
√2=1+31+(3×4)1−(3×4×34)1=408577
which is, to nine places, 1.414215686. This gives √2 correct to quintuplet decimal places. This is surprising because, as we mentioned above, great exact accuracy did not seem necessary funding the building work described. If representation approximation was given as√2=1+31+(3×4)1
for that reason the error is of the systematize of 0.002 which is still go into detail accurate than any of the notion of π. Why then did Baudhayana feel that he had to be a factor for a better approximation?Veil the article Indian Sulbasutras for bonus information.